|
RubiStar |
Rubric Made Using:
RubiStar ( http://rubistar.4teachers.org )
|
|
|
CATEGORY |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
|
Originality |
Presentation shows considerable originality and
inventiveness. The content and ideas are presented in a unique and
interesting way. |
Presentation shows some originality and inventiveness.
The content and ideas are presented in an interesting way. |
Presentation shows an attempt at originality and
inventiveness on 1-2 cards. |
Presentation is a rehash of other people's ideas
and/or graphics and shows very little attempt at original thought.
|
|
Text - Font Choice & Formatting |
Font formats (e.g., color, bold, italic) have been
carefully planned to enhance readability and content. |
Font formats have been carefully planned to enhance
readability. |
Font formating has been carefully planned to
complement the content. It may be a little hard to read. |
Font formatting makes it very difficult to read the
material. |
|
Content - Accuracy |
All content throughout the presentation is accurate.
There are no factual errors. |
Most of the content is accurate but there is one piece
of information that might be inaccurate. |
The content is generally accurate, but one piece of
information is clearly flawed or inaccurate. |
Content is typically confusing or contains more than
one factual error. |
|
Spelling and Grammar |
Presentation has no misspellings or grammatical
errors. |
Presentation has 1-2 misspellings, but no grammatical
errors. |
Presentation has 1-2 grammatical errors but no
misspellings. |
Presentation has more than 2 grammatical and/or
spelling errors. |
|
Sequencing of Information |
Information is organized in a clear, logical way. It
is easy to anticipate the type of material that might be on the next card.
|
Most information is organized in a clear, logical way.
One card or item of information seems out of place. |
Some information is logically sequenced. An
occassional card or item of information seems out of place. |
There is no clear plan for the organization of
information. |
|
Use of Graphics |
All graphics are attractive (size and colors) and
support the theme/content of the presentation. |
A few graphics are not attractive but all support the
theme/content of the presentation. |
All graphics are attractive but a few do not seem to
support the theme/content of the presentation. |
Several graphics are unattractive AND detract from the
content of the presentation. |
|
Cooperation |
Group delegates tasks and shares responsibility
effectively all of the time. |
Group delegates tasks and shares responsibility
effectively most of the time. |
Group delegates tasks and shares responsibility
effectively some of the time. |
Group often is not effective in delegating tasks
and/or sharing responsibility. |
|
Effectiveness |
Project includes all material needed to gain a
comfortable understanding of the topic. It is a highly effective study
guide. |
Project includes most material needed to gain a
comfortable understanding of the material but is lacking one or two key
elements. It is an adequate study guide. |
Project is missing more than two key elements. It
would make an incomplete study guide. |
Project is lacking several key elements and has
inaccuracies that make it a poor study guide.
|
| © 2004, 2003, 2002, 2001 High Plains Regional Technology in Education Consortium HPR*TEC |